| dc.description.abstract | The increasing adoption of three-dimensional (3D) printing in engineering applications presents
significant advantages, particularly in reducing production costs and lead times. However, the mechanical
properties of widely used 3D-printed materials, such as PLA, PETG, and ABS, are greatly influenced by
printing parameters, which subsequently affect structural reliability and design accuracy. This study
investigates the tensile behavior of materials fabricated through Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), following
ASTM D638 Type IV standards. The experimental results obtained from a Universal Testing Machine (UTM)
reveal notable differences in mechanical performance among the tested materials. PLA demonstrated the highest
tensile strength (49.16 ± 5.21 MPa) and stiffness (2.57 ± 1.27 GPa) but exhibited brittle fracture with limited
elongation (0.37 ± 0.02%). PETG showed balanced performance, with comparable tensile strength (44.70 ± 2.62
MPa), moderate stiffness (2.23 ± 0.76 GPa), and the highest elongation (0.46 ± 0.08%), indicating a satisfactory
strength–ductility synergy. In contrast, ABS displayed the lowest tensile strength (30.37 ± 2.73 MPa) and stiffness
(1.80 ± 1.23 GPa); however, it maintainedadequate toughness with the highest elongation (0.52 ± 0.08%).
Numerical simulations conducted using SolidWorks Simulation and ANSYS Workbench were compared to the
experimental data. The simulation results followed similar trends, with deviations ranging from −7.7% to 2.8%,
which are acceptable for engineering applications. PLA and ABS exhibited close agreement between
experimental and simulation values, while PETG showed slightly larger discrepancies due to its ductile
characteristics and sensitivity to printing parameters. Predictions from ANSYS were marginally closer to the
experimental data than those from SolidWorks, reflecting higher accuracy in stress analysis. This study
illustrates that integrating experimental testing with numerical simulations yields reliable predictions of tensile
properties for FDM-printed polymers. | en_US |