Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPanittra Narapiromkwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhutsadee Boonnoonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-28T07:28:44Z
dc.date.available2016-11-28T07:28:44Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.rmutr.ac.th/123456789/339
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research study. To study and compare the evaluation committee. Of Regents of the University of To contribute to the development of the evaluation model. University of Technology This study The qualitative research Population and sample used in the study include the Councillors. And the Office of Personnel Council of State Universities of 4. The tools used in this research is to gather information. Document Analysis Self assessment of the Board of Regents of the University. And the information to be given a series of interviews with the research team The results showed that The study analyzed and compared to assess the Board of Regents of Technology. The results are summarized as follows 1.1 format to specify the query criteria to evaluate the role of the Councillors. The Convention of the Council. And the meeting of the Council includes 29 items 1.2 The form should specify the criteria assessment questions revealed that the Convention of the Council. And the meeting of the Council of 7 items totalen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRajamangala University Of Technology Rattanakosinen_US
dc.language.isoTHen_US
dc.publisherRajamangala University Of Technology Rattanakosinen_US
dc.subjectcouncilen_US
dc.subjectRajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosinen_US
dc.subjectRMUTRen_US
dc.titleThe Council’s assessment of Rajamangala University of Technology Rattanakosinen_US
dc.title.alternativeรูปแบบการประเมินกรรมการสภามหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีราชมงคลรัตนโกสินทร์en_US
dc.typeResearchen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record